Terror infests Pakistan

UPI Asia.com

Toronto, ON, Canada, — Terror has become a daily affair in Pakistan, which has hit civilians the most due to suicide bombers mingling with them. Such attacks are sometimes a result of the Pashtun tribesmen’s pique at the Pakistani government; other times they are interfaith rivalries between the Sunni and Shiite communities. In addition, they are also “bomb battles” between rival political party activists in big cities.

This all began when Pakistan started training terrorists for attacks in Indian-controlled Kashmir. When this met with immediate success, terror activities were expanded to cover the rest of India. The last attack took place in Mumbai in November 2008.

With every successful explosion terrorists have become more sophisticated, with some using bombs to settle their local grievances. In October last year a Sunni resistance group reportedly carried out a suicide bomb attack on Iran’s elite Revolutionary Guards that killed several top commanders.

Pakistani authorities never anticipated that terrorists would turn against them. In 2009, some 6,000 Pakistanis died in terror attacks, making it one of the bloodiest years of domestic violence. Half of those killed were security personnel. Read more:

Muslims Slaughter Christians in Egypt.

Pakistan Christian Post By Lee Jay Walker, Tokyo Correspondent, THE SEOUL TIMES

Over half a dozen Coptic Christians were killed and another half dozen were hurt in a Thursday morning drive-by shooting following a Christmas midnight Mass in Nag Hamadi in Upper Egypt.
Another year may have just started but in Egypt the endless persecution of Christians goes on and the endless martyrs who follow the faith of Christianity “shine out” in a world of hatred. However, why does this suffering continue in Egypt and in other parts of the world?
This article is in response to the recent murders of Christians in Egypt and I aim to link the current situation with the bloody history of Egypt and its endless persecution of Christians.
According to popular myth Egypt is a moderate nation and this mainly Muslim nation is meant to be a moderate bastion within the mainly intolerant “Islamic world.” However, while Muslims in this nation highlight the fact that you have thousands of churches, they fail to say why and they gloss over the endless persecution and discrimination within Egypt.
After all, Egypt was mainly Christian before countless Islamic invasions and in time Arabization would limit the role of the Coptic language and colonialization took root over many centuries. The indigenous Christians of Egypt already had a rich Coptic culture and history and the Coptic Christian church was blessed with a strong-minded priesthood.
However, constant Islamic invasions, linguistic colonialization via Arabic, massacres of Christians, and systematic persecution of Christianity via Islamic Sharia law and dhimmitude; meant that Islam would rule supreme.

Of course, not all Muslim rulers were anti-Christian but Coptic Christians always had to rely on the given ruler for protection. Yet, irrespective if the ruler was moderate or anti-Christian, one theme remained the same and this applies to institutionalized discrimination and persecution which is part and parcel of Islam and Islamic Sharia law.
Therefore, from the early conquests and up until today, it is clear that converts from Islam to Christianity face persecution. Yes, Islamic enlightenment in Egypt means that in the past the convert to Christianity would be killed, however, now it is mere prison or persecution or a mixture of both.
Turning back to the reason of this article, I will now focus on recent events in Egypt in 2010. For on January 6 in Nagaa Hamady, which is near Luxor, Muslims killed six Christians and one security guard. They were gunned down on Christmas Eve (Christmas day is January 7 for Coptic Christians and other Orthodox Christians) and clearly the timing was important.
Yet for many Christians in Egypt this is all about the embedded persecution of Christianity in this nation. Therefore the recent massacre is further evidence that Islamic intolerance and systematic persecution is part and parcel of the traditions of Egypt since the first Islamic invasion began.

In recent times you have had many attacks against Christians and this applies to murders, riots against Christians, attacks against Coptic Christian churches, abduction and forced rapes of Christian females, and other insidious forms of discrimination and persecution.
In truth, ever since the first Islamic conquest of Egypt you have had systematic persecution because religious pluralism and freedom of thought does not exist in Islam. Therefore, from the very foundation of Islam in Egypt it was clear that Christians had to pay tax (jizya) in order to be protected and non-payment could mean death, enslavement, or forced conversion.
It is worth mentioning that Mohammed himself stated that Muslims must (Koran 9:29) "Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Messenger have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection."
Therefore, it is clear that Mohammed understood the power of tax and other draconian laws in order to subdue other faiths. After all, how can other faiths thrive when apostasy from Islam means death?

Prof. Kenneth Cragg sums up the dhimmi system by stating that the "Dhimmi, 'tolerated minority,' status under Islam has long made for a pattern of quiescence in ancient, local Christianity around the mosque. Traditional tolerance allowed only a freedom to remain, to teach the faith only within the family, so that adherence became a circumstance of birth, and continuity that of a closed community. There was no freedom to express faith, still less to recruit to it, outside that circle of one's origin."
Coptic Christians after the Islamic conquests were therefore faced with a bleak future. After all, if Coptic Christians were forbidden to propagate their faith freely in public then at best they could only survive. Yet this survival meant severe restrictions and systematic persecution, with the consequences of this being an ever diminishing minority and open to public ridicule because of their inferior status in law, education, and other important areas.
Therefore, in 2010 you have many minorities in mainly Muslim societies who are fighting for survival or who face open persecution because of state sanctioned laws which are based on Islamic Sharia law and maintaining massive inequality.

Minority groups who suffer open persecution in the modern world applies to the Baha’is in Iran; the Shabaks, Christians, Mandaens, and Yazidis who face persecution on a daily basis in Iraq; converts to Christianity in Somalia who are being butchered by radical Sunni Islamists; Buddhists in Southern Thailand have also suffered greatly in recent times including Buddhist clerics being beheaded; Hindus also suffer enormously in both Bangladesh and Pakistan; Ahmadiyya Muslims also face severe persecution in Pakistan and in 2009 several Christians were burnt alive in this nation; while Christians also face daily threats in Northern Nigeria and last year three Christian pastors were beheaded and other terrible attacks took place; the list is endless and of course Coptic Christians in Egypt suffer from both state sanctioned discrimination and being threatened by radical Sunni Islamists.

The current situation in Egypt does not look good for Coptic Christians because the “flawed” political system under President Hosni Mubarak means state sanctioned discrimination. However, you also have the fear that radical Islamists could fill the political vacuum and this would add greatly to the woes of the embattled Christian community in Egypt.
Sadly, major political leaders in many Western nations are in appeasement mode and they are not confronting this global menace. However, radical Islam is also growing in the streets of London and Paris, and in other major cities throughout parts of Europe and in other parts of the mainly non-Muslim world.
Therefore, the ongoing silence towards events in Egypt, Iraq, Northern Nigeria, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Southern Thailand, Somalia, and other mainly Muslim nations; is impacting on other nations because this hatred is spreading wide and far and silence or appeasement isn’t working.

Leaving Failed States Alone By Rabbi Jeremy Rosen

5TJT January 15, 2010

I know this is going to sound harsh and unfeeling but we ought to leave failed states alone to stew in their own self-imposed cruelties. It is, in the end, up to their own citizens to either put up or shut up.
I really thought Obama was going to usher in a new era and stop trying to cure those sick parts of the world that do not want to be healed. But it seems his arms dealers, his scaremongers, his political allies and supporters all have a vested interest in keeping armed forces overseas, sending young men and women to their pointless deaths, and throwing away vast sums of money that could better be used improving the fabric of society and infrastructure at home. I remember in my youth the arguments for staying in Vietnam. There was the domino theory that all of Asia would collapse into Communism. The line had to be drawn. Failed states would present a danger to the USA and World Peace. And they all proved to be false.
If you cannot tend to everyone else's garden, at least you can make sure yours grows properly. And if you put all your energy and resources into trying to help someone who hates gardening to spend time weeding, you will inevitably fail. Have we not yet learnt that no matter how benevolent an occupier is, an occupier is a resented alien who will never be accepted?
I remember vividly the 1967 war in which Israel ejected the Jordanians from the West Bank they had illegally occupied in1948 (though no one in the UN seemed to mind if it was Arab occupying Arab). The Palestinians threw roses at the Israeli tanks as they passed through the villages, so hated were the Jordanians. Unbelievably, the victors simply refused to learn from what their own eyes were telling them--that any occupier comes to be hated, and certainly one who tries to subjugate and disenfranchise. About the only thing to be said in favor of Russia this last century was that she actually did give up on Afghanistan and get out.
So I say cut your losses and get out. Occupation does not work.
Will a failed state become a haven for Al Qaeda terrorists? So isolate that state. Track those who come and go, rather than try to change it from the outside. Any attempt from the outside will be regarded as a crusade, imperialism, or an American Zionist plot. It will only reinforce blind fundamentalism.
In Iraq, the US ended up in league with the very Sunnis it initially booted out of power. The Taliban rulers were ejected from Afghanistan. Yet most analysts now think the only chance of any kind of success is by making a deal with the new Taliban. Meanwhile, they and Al Qaeda are protected within Pakistani territory, because its own political and military system is riddled with fundamentalists and it is a nearly failed state with an already tested nuclear bomb. Look at all the failed states harboring Al Qaeda or other dangerous potential terrorists. Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia. And in the case of Somalia the US left with its tail between its legs. The world cannot even deal with Somali pirates.
There is a mindset amongst many moderate Muslims that only outside intervention can rescue then from the oppressive Muslim regimes they live under. That is why it is argued that the USA should reach out to and support moderates in Iran or Saudi Arabia. Not that she will be thanked. Only when a sufficient number of oppressed citizens within a country feel so strongly about it that they are prepared to rebel can there be any hope of regime change. That, for example, is precisely what happened in Honduras, and in time it will happen in Venezuela too. Hopefully Zimbabwe as well. They are not as toxic as Iran and North Korea--two virtual nuclear powers. Yet no one I have heard is arguing that the USA should invade them.
In Iran the oppressive regime murders, tortures, and rapes its own people. That’s the way in the East. No one is making a fuss of Christians killed in Egypt or Malaysia. Who cares if in Abu Dhabi a royal prince gets off scot-free after torturing and maiming another Muslim. We don't expect justice or freedom in such places. Shall we invade them too?
Thanks to China's refusal to countenance any interference in the internal affairs of regimes, there is no way to impose universal sanctions or effective restrictions. Free countries have no alternative other than to rely on their own methods of self-protection.
As for locally born terror, stop pretending it is exceptional. Political correctness and appeasement will not protect anyone. Britain still refuses to acknowledge that its universities are centers of recruitment for aggressive Islam, something students have been telling anyone who would listen for years.
America's decision to require stricter security for visitors from certain Muslim states which harbor terror has been attacked both by American Muslims and Civil Rights campaigners. I hope the USA stands firm (I know Europe won't). I do feel very sorry for innocent peace-loving Muslims who suffer as a result. But they have it in their own hands either to help change regimes or bring the pressure to bear on those Muslims who give Islam a bad name. ♦

The Last Nail in Europe's Coffin

By Pamela Geller
Because of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership between the European Union and Islamic states in the Middle East, by the year 2050, the Islamic population of Europe will be 25% to 30% of the total population. There will be perhaps over 100 million Muslims in Europe. Partnership? More like a suicide pact. Fifty million laborers with families. The effects on European civilization, and on Europe's relationship with the United States, are all too easy to imagine. And the U.S.-Muslim engagement document, the blueprint for the Obama administration's relationship with Muslim countries, parallels these... (Read Full Article)

Två bilder som inte visas i svensk media ang kravallerna i Italien

Svenska tidningar rapporterar om de kravaller som äger rum i Rosarno, Italien. Enligt uppgifter ska kravallerna börjat efter att två stycket illegala invandrare från Afrika blivit beskjutna med luftgevär. Det är givetvis vidrigt om de blev anfallna helt oprovocerade. Dock menar jag utan tvekan att de illegala invandrarnas beteende därefter är oacceptabelt:

Following the first incident, more than 100 immigrants rampaged through the town on Thursday night, smashing car windows with steels bars, setting rubbish bins and cars on fire, and clashing with police in riot gear

och

A young mother with a bruise under an eye and a bandage on the side of her head, told state TV a group of migrants started smashing her car. The woman said that, fearful for the safety of her small children, she managed to drive about two meters (6 feet), before her attackers pushed her car into a wall. Terrified, she fled with her family, and the assailants set her car afire, she said.

 

Se bilderna på Ted Ekeroths sida:

”Sverigedemokraterna är en ortodox minoritetsgrupp”- DN smutskastar igen.

DN

Et dumt försök att smutskasta SD. N'är jag först läste artikeln i morse fanns det kommentarer, dessa är borttagna som ni ser om ni går till orginialartikeln (länk ovan). Att skriva kommentar får man inte längre. Alla kommentarer jag läste stödde SD, någon tyckte att artikeln var velig i åsikterna. Snyggt DN. Här kan ni kommentera dock!

Psykoanalytiker: Att vara svensk är att vara tolerant. På det sättet kan vi tolerera att SD är en ortodox minoritetsgrupp. Men ortodoxa grupper får inte dominera ett samhälle. Sverigedemokraterna gör demagogiska förenklingar för att slippa komplexa sammanhang och vädjar till svart-vitt antingen-eller-tänkande. Om vi skulle tillämpa deras partiprogram på dem själva som en ortodox minoritetsgrupp, skulle de inte få vara kvar här i landet. Sverigedemokraterna är alltför osvenska. Men eftersom vi inte vill vara som SD - utan räknar toleransen som en eftersträvansvärd svensk egenskap - kan de få stanna här om de håller sig inom demokratins gränser, inte hetsar mot folkgrupper eller döljer gamla nazister i sina led, skriver psykoanalytikern och författaren Tomas Böhm i en analys av SD:s partiprogram.

Människor i Sverige består av heterogena grupper under ett gemensamt svenskt paraply – stadsbor, landsortsbor, akademiker, arbetare, invandrare, deras ättlingar, sjukskrivna, ensamstående, sammanboende, missbrukare, näringsidkare etcetera. Det gemensamma paraplyet innebär en tolerans för alla olikheter. Sedan länge vet man inom psykologin att främlingsrädsla och främlingsfientlighet kommer från en egen rädsla för det okända. Vi har alla en rädsla för det vi inte känner till, liksom för det okända inom oss själva, som är frestande att lägga ut på grupper som verkar vara annorlunda eller svaga.

Främlingsfientligheten tar sig ofta uttryck som ett avståndstagande mot det komplexa eller främmande, det som inte går att känna igen omedelbart eller dela in i enkla kategorier.

Sverigedemokraterna vill inte se att de skulle vara främlingsfientliga. De beskriver i sitt partiprogram snarare att ”invandrings- och integrationspolitik har varit ett monumentalt misslyckande. Sverigedemokraterna är det enda parti som vågar säga detta öppet.”

SD tycks vara för det svenska. Det beskrivs bland annat på följande sätt:

”Svensk är den som har en helt övervägande svensk identitet, och som av sig själv och av andra svenskar uppfattas som svensk.”

Det låter som ett cirkelresonemang. Fortfarande vet vi inte vad den svenska identiteten innehåller, men vi varnas för: ”att svenskarna inom några decennier riskerar att bli en minoritet i det egna landet. Denna utveckling kommer att påverka alla aspekter av samhällslivet och förvandla vårt land till oigenkännlighet.”

Det här går att känna igen som rasistisk eller främlingsfientlig mytologi. Om vi inte aktar oss, äter främlingarna upp oss. Sverige har alltid förändrats av dem som bor här. Strax beskrivs det svenska på annat sätt – i språk, kulturarv och historia – där SD blir ännu mer specifika:

”Svenska traditioner, värderingar, regler och lagar skall vara normgivande i hela det svenska samhället. Svenskan skall vara det samhällsbärande språket inom samtliga samhällsområden. Alla former av etnisk kvotering eller positiv särbehandling av invandrare skall avskaffas. Undervisningen i svensk historia skall utökas i skolorna. Den svenska historien och kulturarvet skall lyftas fram och levandegöras i offentliga sammanhang på ett tydligare sätt än i dag.

Det offentliga stödet till invandrarföreningar och alla andra verksamheter som syftar till att befrämja främmande kulturer och identiteter i Sverige skall dras in. Lovdagar i anslutning till religiösa högtider skall endast omfatta traditionella svenska och kristna högtider.”

Det som SD är emot tycks vara osvenskt. Rädslan för det främmande utanför och inom oss själva klumpas ihop och vänds utåt och blir osvenskt, för att det är svårt att acceptera eller förstå.

SD är rädda för det komplicerade och mal ner det till en svensk förenkling bestående av svensk eller – osvensk. På demagogiskt sätt skriver man inte osvensk i partiprogrammet. Man talar i stället om att: ”kulturellt främmande enklaver i de flesta städer är inte hållbart”.

Man gör också den demagogiska förenklingen för att slippa komplexa sammanhang och vädja till svart-vitt antingen-eller-tänkande. Alla vill väl känna tillhörighet, men här beskrivs den som om den beror på hur homogent samhället är:

”Rotlösheten står i motsats till något som är väldigt viktigt för oss Sverigedemokrater – rätten till en nationell identitet. Alla människor måste få känna att de tillhör ett folk.”

Man förnekar också den egna främlingsfientligheten på ett sätt som påminner om resonemanget att många av mina vänner är invandrare. Vi ska inte märka fientligheten genom att …

”Sverigedemokraterna är inte principiellt emot invandring.”

Ju längre bort ifrån Sverige som invandrarna kommer, desto mindre bra är deras kultur för vårt land. Jag kan till och med tänka mig att några som skrivit detta program kan ha varit ärliga – det vill säga inte demagogiska. De tror faktiskt att det svenska skyddas av det de skriver. Man döljer främlingsfientligheten genom att uttala sig mot rasism, men i stället varnar man för det man kallar mångkulturalism.

”… De senaste årens invandring har dock varit av helt annan art. Det har handlat om tiotusentals invandrare varje år, från avlägsna delar av världen, vilket inte varit bra för Sverige.”

”… Partiet tar avstånd från mångkulturalism, rasism och läror där det etniska ursprunget räknas som det enda eller avgörande kriteriet för nationstillhörighet.”

Ett centralt problem är att SD kopplar samman det svenska – svensk identitet, språk och kultur – med ett avståndstagande från andra grupper, det vill säga invandrare, särskilt från dem som kommer långt bort ifrån. Samtidigt är det sannolikt att även SD-medlemmar och de som röstar på dem har lika mycket invandrare bland sina förfäder som vi andra.

I stället skulle man kunna hävda att det svenska är att vara tolerant och inte se en svensk identitet som något klart en gång för alla. Den är påverkbar och öppen för inflytande, liksom vi svenskar påverkar dem som kommer hit. Så har det alltid tyckts vara. I det svenska ingår då också att tolerera grupper som vill ha sin egen uppfattning och syn på hur man ska leva. På det sättet kan vi svenskar tolerera att SD har sin uppfattning, även om de får hålla sin intolerans för sig själva eftersom den är alltför förenklad, demagogisk och främlingsfientlig. Minoritetsgrupper får bära burka, sjunga sina sånger, äta sin mat, bara de tolererar andra grupper och de gemensamma spelreglerna. Ortodoxa personer som tror på rätt och fel i alla komplexa sammanhang – som SD kan beskrivas som – kan inte tillåtas att dominera ett samhälle.

Om vi alltså skulle tillämpa SD:s program på dem själva som en ortodox minoritetsgrupp, skulle de inte få vara kvar här eftersom de är alltför osvenska. Men eftersom vi inte vill vara som SD, utan räknar toleransen som en eftersträvansvärd svensk egenskap, kan de få stanna här om de håller sig inom demokratins gränser, inte hetsar mot folkgrupper eller döljer gamla nazister i sina led.

Tomas Böhm, psykoanalytiker, författare till bl a ”Inte som vi – psykologiska aspekter på främlingsfientlighet och rasism” (N & K, 1993), ”Att ha rätt – om övertygelse, tolerans och fundamentalism” (N & K, 1998).

Rättegång mot skjutgalen islamist i Odense

Jihad i Malmö

 

Just nu pågår rättegången mot Wissam Freijeh (28) i Odense för femdubbelt mordförsök.....Det var denne skjutgalne islamist och antisemit som förra nyårsaftonen sköt ned två israeliska försäljare i Rosengaardscentret i Odense. Freijeh är tungt kriminellt belastad och fanatisk antisemit.

**

Läs mer om hans stormiga bakgrund på Snaphanen. Komiskt nog var han en period omkring 2003-4 anlitad som "föredömlig invandrare" och föredöme för ungdomen av kommunen och danska LO. Odense plockade dock bort allt om kampanjen sedan han gripits för skjutningen... Föredömen bör uppenbarligen inte ägna sig åt rasistisk kriminalitet.

***

Första rättegångsdagen hävdade Freijeh att det enbart handlade om "självförsvar". Israelerna hade stirrat på honom och... "- Israelerne har taget alt fra min familie, dræbt dem og taget deres jord og huse. Så kommer man i Rosengårdcentret og tror, man bare kan gøre, hvad der passer en, sagde den 28-årige i retten."

**

Komiskt nog avslöjade Wissams bror att familjen är libaneser och alls inte fördrivits från det imaginära "palestina".

Fortsättning följer

****

Den vackra staden Odense, H C Andersens födelsestad,har fått rykte om sig som ett centrum för islamism och antisemitism de senaste åren. Islamistiska ligor styr stadsdelen Vollsmose (med egen shariadomstol), jihadistiska terrorister härjar, rabbiner överfalls på gatorna och nyårsafton 2008 sköts två israeler ned i stadens stora shopping- centrum Rosengaard.

Danmarks överrabbin avråder judiska föräldrar från att placera sina barn i stadens skolor p g a det höga antalet araber....

Det låter nästan som Sveriges Gaza, Malmö....

Islamisternas julklapp till kopterna: sju döda

Kopterna, Egyptens ursprungsbefolkning och kristna minoritet, är återigen hårt trängda av våldsamma islamister och oförstående myndigheter. När de firade julmässa i staden Nag Hamadi nära Luxor angreps församlingen av beväpnade jihadister. Sju kristna och en polis dödades.

Se en kort film från angreppet:

Läs mera på Free Copts

"Vi kan alla bli en Westergaard"

Jihad i Malmö

På måndagen berättar konstnären Lars Vilks att han fått ett telefonhot - från

Somalia.

— Mannen, som talade på bruten svenska, frågade om jag kände till vad som hänt i

Danmark och konstnären Kurt Westergaard. Jag sa att jag förstås visste om det, säger

Lars Vilks och fortsätter: — Då förklarade mannen att de var ute efter

mer och de snart skulle komma till mig. Då hälsade jag dem välkomna.

Samtalet avslutades men mannen ringer då upp igen.

— Han återupprepar att "de kommer, de kommer" ett flertal tillfällen. Sedan avslutas samtalet,

säger Lars Vilks.

Vilks kommenterar hotet

Nu är ju Westergaard och Vilks långtifrån ensamma om att hotas och angripas av

islamister. Den norska författaren Hege Storhaug berättar nu öppet om när hon

överfölls i sitt hem för tre år sedan. Storhaug hade genom sina böcker och

artiklar utmanat de starka islamistiska krafterna i Oslo och extremvänstern.
Men så; noen uker etter dette ble jeg brutaltslått ned i min egen leilighet. Der ble jeg

funnet i en blodpøl og med tydelige tegn etter kamp over store deler av kroppen min

og blodsøl i leiligheten. Jeg kunne ikke gjøre rede for meg, jeg hadde hatt black out.

I tillegg til alt blodet, var deler av listeverket på ytterdøren til leiligheten knust.

Ingenting var stjålet.

***

Helle Merete Brix påminner om de tidigare försöken att mörda Westergaard, men också

om alla andra som utsätts för konstant hot och terror från islamisterna. Såväl de kända, som

Salman Rushdie och Ayan Hirsi Ali, som de okända hjältarna som den franske läraren

Robert Redeker.

Många säger att det värsta är upplevelsen att vara bortglömda av samhället.

Journalister, politiker och det övriga åsikts- etablissemanget vänder dem ryggen och

stöder därmed indirekt frihetens fiender.....

****

Fortsättning på

Somalisk terrorist försökte mörda

Kurt Westergaard

Westergaard-attentatorn kvalificerad terrorist

Race, Immigration, and Rape in Sweden

The noted blogger Fjordman is filing this report via Gates of Vienna.
For a complete Fjordman blogography, see The Fjordman Files. There is also a multi-index listing here.

According to a recent report, six percent of Swedish girls are raped every year, and that’s just the official numbers. Reality is probably even worse. The hostile Wikipedia entry on “Fjordman” previously claimed that myessays about the Swedish rape epidemic are false because the massive increase in rapes was caused by “a widening of the legal definition of rape.” I bet it was.

In this situation, the number one preoccupation of Swedish media is demonizing Israel, and the number two preoccupation is demonizing native Swedish critics of mass immigration and barring them from access to the mass media.
Sweden tops European rape league:
- - - - - - - - -

Sweden has the highest incidence of reported rapes in Europe — twice as many as “runner up” the UK, a new study shows. Researchers behind the EU study, which will be presented on Tuesday, conclude that rape appears to be a more common occurrence in Sweden than in continental European countries. In Sweden, 46 incidents of rape are reported per 100,000 residents. This figure is double as many as in the UK which reports 23 cases, and four times that of the other Nordic countries, Germany and France. The figure is up to 20 times the figure for certain countries in southern and eastern Europe.

As I have pointed out in my book Defeating Eurabia, where I devote an entire chapter to explaining the appalling situation in Sweden, Ethnologist Maria Bäckman, in her study “Whiteness and gender,” has followed a group of Swedish girls in the suburb of Rinkeby outside Stockholm, where natives have been turned into a minority of the inhabitants due to immigration. The subjects “may encounter prejudices such as the idea that Swedish girls act and dress in a sexually provocative way or that blonde girls are easy.” Bäckman relates that several of the Swedish girls she interviewed stated that they had dyed their hair to avoid sexual harassment. They experienced that being blonde involves old men staring at you, cars honking their horns and boys calling you “whore.”
Swedish girls suffer widespread harassment: report

Every third young Swede has been subjected to repeated harassment, threats or violence over the past year. Six percent of young girls have been raped, a new report from Swedish researchers shows.

One interesting comment to this article:

I hope someone can answer those questions for you. Unfortunately I'm not to good on stuff like that. What I do know however, is that the courts take lighter on rape perps with immigrant background than ethnic swedish perps. They have to weigh in that they come from a widely different culture than ours. Which is just sick. Also, the raped girls get asked questions on the matter of dressing when they where raped. If they had short skirts and visible cleavages and such, they are basically told that they can suit themselves who didn't dress more modestly instead. Another thing is that the family/clan of the perps are often audience in the courts, often giving thumbs up to their boys, whistling or shouting whore to the girls. Yes, swedish citizens are already dhimmis 100%, no doubt about it.